Shadowmancer

I first heard about "Shadowmancer" when it first came to the US, a British import that was, at the time, thought to be the next "Harry Potter." However, the buzz about "Shadowmancer" died down pretty quickly, and I forgot about it until I saw it at Borders in the discount bin and decided to buy it on a whim.

Well, now I've read it, and I can safely say it is not the next "Harry Potter." It's awkwardly written in places, its trio of young protagonists are nowhere near as likable as Harry, Ron, and Hermione, and its plot is just silly. It's not a terrible book, but it's not worth your time.

"Shadowmancer" is set in 18th or 19th century Yorkshire, in the town of Bayton, under the tyrannical rule of the book's villain, Vicar Obadiah Demurral. As well as exploiting the townsfolk to work in his alum mine, Demurral has decided to attempt to seize enormous supernatural power, through the possession of two holy artifacts known as Keruvim. The book opens with him acquiring one of them, a small gold statue. He uses it to summon a sea monster to sink the ship carrying the other one.

However, the other Keruvim is not a statue, but a young Ethopian man named Raphah, the guardian of the first Keruvim. Raphah survives the ship wreck and encounters our other two protagonists, a young boy and girl named Thomas and Kate. Thomas is an orphan, his father dead and his mother in a hospital slowly dying, while Kate has a father, but a distant one who doesn't pay much attention to her. Raphah quickly convinces the other two of the importance of his mission and gets them to help him.

I didn't like any of the characters so far. Demurral just seemed ridiculous to me, so obviously evil that I saw no point in making him a vicar, a person one would think would at least pretend to have a shred sanctity, but he's a cookie-cutter cartoon villain. Raphah, on the other hand, is too sanctimonious, patronizing in his faith in Riathamus, who is pretty transparently the Christian God, and he grated on me. Thomas and Kate just didn't make much of an impression on me: there's nothing to particularly distinguish them from the standard "orphaned child protagonist" package. About the only character I did like was a fifth main character, a smuggler named Jacob Crane. Crane is cynical, morally grey, gruff, but has a good heart under all of his bluster. I also like that he reacted perhaps the most realistically of all the characters in the face of the supernatural occurrences: he is suspicious, but doesn't deny the evidence of his own eyes.

As mentioned, Riathamus is pretty transparently the Christian God. In addition, the supernatural force that Demurral attempts to deal with, Pyratheon, is pretty obviously Lucifer. Possibly these two name changes are because the author, G.P. Taylor, is himself an Anglican vicar, and bringing God and the Devil into the story might have been considered blasphemous, but every time someone referred to them, I groaned on the inside. On a related note, a lot of the invented terminology Taylor uses for various supernatural things (Keruvim, Seloth, Glashan, Varigal, etc.) just sound stupid. I'm guessing that Taylor was trying for words that sound vaguely Hebrew, but it just seemed stupid.

From Taylor's introduction, it's clear that he loves and knows a lot about the folklore of Yorkshire. In early chapters, you even get hints at this, as characters refer to local fairies and the like, and the introduction of a family of characters identified as boggles, but all of that is dropped once we hit about the halfway mark, and replaced with aforesaid stupid cosmology.

Finally, the writing just isn't good. Dialogue especially can be clunky, and more often than not I completely forgot about a chapter after moving on to the next chapter. It's not painfully bad, but I didn't feel particularly motivated to finish it.

"Shadowmance" isn't a terrible book, it's just not a good one. I do not plan to read this book again, nor do I plan on reading its sequel, nor any other book by Taylor. I would advise not reading it.